Turn one high-friction workflow into software your team can use in production, without waiting on another long delivery cycle.

UltB case study
Recovered kickoff value
$180K/year
“The Team Titan platform helped us get clear on the bottleneck fast and turn it into a real kickoff system we can keep improving.”
Igor Shapiro, Founder, UltB
See how UltB did itA sample of the software a Team Titan pilot can deliver for one important workflow.
Before the pilot
Requests are scattered across inboxes, spreadsheets, partial tools, and internal follow-up.
Existing software does not give leaders a clear queue, status view, or decision history.
Customers or internal teams still wait on updates because the workflow depends on fragmented systems and manual coordination.
Pricing and exception workspace
Turn scattered requests, unclear ownership, and manual follow-up into one usable workflow surface.

A prioritized queue for pending requests and exceptions
Full context panel for why a decision is needed now
Decision history, ownership, and status visibility in one place
A software surface your team can review, run, and extend
How TTAI compares
The same product scope, delivered in days instead of quarters.
Time to launch
From kickoff to a usable MVP
Baseline
12 months
With TTAI
12 days
Cost to launch
Estimated cost to get the same workflow live
Baseline
$1,813,998
With TTAI
$50,000
Delivery hours
Team time required to get the same workflow live
Baseline
9,546 hrs
With TTAI
1,005 hrs
Based on a 12-month complex mid-market MVP build across product, design, engineering, QA, integration, analytics, security, GTM, and program support.
TTAI comparison reflects a $50,000 pilot over a 3-4 week engagement.
The motion stays simple: identify one workflow worth improving, turn it into a production-ready pilot, and measure whether it deserves a broader rollout.
In 15-30 minutes, the goal is to pressure-test one workflow, not to force a platform presentation before the business case is clear.
Identify the workflow
Pick the process that is slow, fragmented, still manual, or still poorly supported by the way the team works today.
Pressure-test the fit
Review the systems involved, the operational bottleneck, and whether the scope is tight enough for a credible pilot.
Decide the next step
Leave knowing whether the workflow deserves a fixed-scope pilot or should stay off the roadmap for now.